tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38035217.post4726284786696828369..comments2023-10-25T04:58:06.517-04:00Comments on The Projection Booth: The Hangover (2009): Crob humanickhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03393593631883026810noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38035217.post-66804891483840736872011-04-04T00:00:22.951-04:002011-04-04T00:00:22.951-04:00John - Nothing about this review makes it sound li...John - Nothing about this review makes it sound like the reviewer is taking the movie too seriously. They basically just said that the movie isn't funny.<br /><br />And just because a movie is meant to be a comedy doesn't make it above criticism. If he thought the movie was stupid, then he thought it was stupid.<br /><br />Lastly, yeah, characters should have motivations. Even in stupid Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38035217.post-48899451797394245932011-04-03T06:35:47.796-04:002011-04-03T06:35:47.796-04:00@Anonymous 8:41: This movie surely defines its cha...@Anonymous 8:41: This movie surely defines its characters by their contrasting archetypes, but they are primarily STRAIGHT and MANLY, in the most homophobic and juvenile of ways. If you want to judge the movie as a product aimed at pigheaded frat boys, that's fine, but it's too rank and uninspired to work as comedic entertainment for me. Your comparison fails.rob humanickhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03393593631883026810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38035217.post-57439075414222820772011-03-25T08:41:39.061-04:002011-03-25T08:41:39.061-04:00"defining ... characters via their non-femini..."defining ... characters via their non-femininity and non-homosexuality"? <br /><br />Seriously?<br /><br />The main characters were all heterosexual males, but they weren't defined by that. If they were "defined" by anything, it was their individual roles within the movie: the drug-addicted moron, the dentist in an unhappy relationship, the jerk, and the soon-to-be groomAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38035217.post-84970171100627620142011-01-06T01:39:23.847-05:002011-01-06T01:39:23.847-05:00Well, it may be not Citizen Cane, but for a comedy...Well, it may be not Citizen Cane, but for a comedy.. hhmmm it is simply not funny! The whole main joke in about "how we got drunk and did stupid things" may be only funny for a teen-ager having his first experiences with alcohol. I really like silly and funny comedies this one is not funny, just silly. Lol.Dressynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38035217.post-14109530970417313562011-01-03T11:26:19.668-05:002011-01-03T11:26:19.668-05:00I think you've made the mistake of taking the ...I think you've made the mistake of taking the movie a bit too seriously. It's not Citizen Kane, it's supposed to be a light-hearted throwaway comedy. <br /><br />Your delicate sensibilities regarding femininity, homosexuality and especially behavioural motivation (lol) are hilariously out of place. It's about a bunch of guys celebrating their friend's last moments of 'Johnhttp://www.overblownreviews.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38035217.post-41570632658947452972010-10-15T22:46:36.165-04:002010-10-15T22:46:36.165-04:00Were you sleepy drunk when you saw it? I and ever...Were you sleepy drunk when you saw it? I and everyone else who saw it couldn't contain their belly-ache from laughing. Granted it's not cinematic art, but it is entertainment at its best.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com