Time has the power to add poignancy to all things, so while I'd probably argue Bad Santa as a modern comedy classic despite the fact that two if its stars are now dead only these six and a half years later, it's silly to pretend that that shadow doesn't alter the perception: more recently, Bernie Mac was taken before his time (we like to think), and I barely knew John Ritter. The Dark Knight's Heath Ledger is the best recent example of this, of course, but larger-than-life bravura does not usurp quiet dignitaries-- it merely eclipses them in the eyes of fools. Bad Santa is a movie about the importance of details, of little things, of life and happiness found in the out-of-the-way places, and on a level field, Ritter's posthumous turn is as profound as Ledger's fire-and-brimstone-from-the-grave (the more recently departed Mac was, as always, alive, paling all around him).
Fantastic performances aside - and I haven't even touched on the title character yet - Bad Santa is really about two things: the audacity of the movie to think it could exist in the first place, and that required to actually bear it into creation. The holiday spirit antithesis did and still does offend like so much shock value (I said it then and I say it now: the movie is rated R, why did you take your children?), but what elevates Terry Zwigoff's comedy, based on a story by the Brothers Coen, is its lack of posturing. These people - Willie Stokes (Billy Bob Thornton in his finest hour), an alcoholic thief impersonating a mall Santa; "The Kid" (Brett Kelly; his name is one of the film's best jokes), an overweight and virtually unsupervised child; Sue (Lauren Graham of Gilmore Girls), a bartender and Santa fetishist - are fucked up indeed, but all the funnier (and more tragic, as goes the film's dual planes of existence) for their respected humanity. Willie heaves kneejerk insults at The Kid for curiosity and prowess at chess, but what remains unspoken is how observant and intelligent he is between the lines of obscenity (The Kid, not Willie).
Not unlike the Coen Brothers's own directorial output this past decade, Bad Santa works in large part conceptualization, part exacting execution, and all (A Serious Man, No Country for Old Men, etc.) take deliberate joy in jerking their audiences around, both in craft and emotionally-piercing lyricism. Bad Santa is high low art. As Willie, Thornton is a tour-de-force of his own: a crotchety curmudgeon with a heart worth loving if you get to know him past the vile surface, one that is, indeed, very thick. Pissing freely in his Santa suit and telling a dozen kids to fuck off would not be an unusual afternoon, and the never-better Billy Bob captures it like existential lightning in a bottle. People don't simply speak in this movie: they spar, and like an orchestral comedic throwdown, Bad Santa is drunk on beautiful obscenities. The very pacing seems largely predicated on the verbal music of an embittered black small person heaving vocal bricks at Willie ad nausea, alone (Tony Cox as Marcus, Willie's long time elf cohort; what recent movie has offered this many great comedy teams?). It's also an unprecedentedly uplifting experience, borderline Shakespearean in its purity, entering deliberate (but earned) It's a Wonderful Life territory with a mirror to that classic's bridge jumping scene. Then again, George Bailey never kicked Mr. Potter in the nuts. Bad Santa inspires fits of laughter and tears, but you could file it next to that film with a straight face.
Directed by: Terry Zwigoff Screenplay by: John Requa and Glenn Ficarra Starring: Billy Bob Thornton, Tony Cox, Bernie Mac, Lauren Graham, John Ritter, Cloris Leachman and Brett Kelly 2003, Rated R, 93 minutes
A few questions. First off, which version of the movie are you reviewing? I know of three versions (the theatrical cut, the unrated cut, and the director's cut), is there any one you'd recommend over the others? Also, I saw the movie (I believe it was the unrated cut) years ago and had problems with the ending. Frankly, I didn't buy it. *Spoiler alert!* Willie gets shot, like, eight times and manages to not only survive, but completely recover, as if he never got shot at all. He ends up living in that mansion with Lauren Graham and The Kid, lands what seems to be a sweet job instructing the police force on why it's fucked up to shoot an unarmed suspect eight times, and apparently lives happily ever after. I thought it felt like an ending demanded by the studio. I remember when Roger Ebert reviewed this back in the day and he said the ending was basically, "they amputated my feet, but I found my shoes," but it didn't seem that way to me. What did you think of the ending? Did it work for you? Thanks for your time and for the review.
ReplyDeleteThis review was for the original theatrical cut of the film, which I had to hunt down on DVD (I should have specified, so thanks for asking). I'm not a fan of the "Badder Santa" cut, which destroys the pacing at points and isn't any funnier for the trade-off. Haven't yet seen the Director's Cut of the film, although I did recently purchase it and will be making a point of it soon.
ReplyDeleteAs for the ending, that everything wraps up relatively neat and tidy strikes me as primarily well-polished screenwriting. When it comes to Willie's survival, though, one thing to take note of is that - spoilers ahead - as Willie is being shot, we see the same moment replayed three times from slightly different angles, thus making the 8 bullets he takes look like more than twenty. Still amazing what the body can take, though.