Apr 3, 2007

Zombi 3 (1988): B-

Lucio Fucli’s long-delayed, sequel-in-name-only Zombi 3 is not without its joys, but the film, sadly, never reaches the same depths of poor taste that made Zombi 2 (a film I initially hated before developing a palate for such bottom-of-the-barrel B-movie fare) such a wretchedly good time. Whereas the first unofficial sequel to Romero’s Dawn of the Dead (released under the moniker Zombi in Fulci’s homeland) shunned character, logic, and even narrative cohesion for the sake of stunning makeup work and revolutionary zombie action (three words: zombie versus shark), Zombi 3 spends more than half of its running time going through rudimentary plot tactics, rendering its grindhouse goodies nearly stale by the time it gets around to them. That being said, the grisly camerawork (often changing stocks within a single scene) and deliriously bad acting (complimented further by barely decipherable vocal dubbing) give the film something of an otherworldly vigor, no matter how ridiculous its relentlessly popping-up zombies become by the end. Here, the undead foreshadow those in Danny Boyle’s genre-reinventing 28 Days Later...; infected by a radioactive and mutated virus, the living become berserk monsters who not only eat human flesh, but attack with maniacal persistence. That all of this is practically unwatchable is a given and should only be approached by seasoned veterans of bad taste, for whom a handful of completely illogical (but startlingly effective) scares and all-out ridiculous zombie attacks will redeem the proceedings, if only just. Among them, a piss-your-pants hilarious bird attack and a sequence that should have (by all means) provided the film with its title: Attack of the Flying Disembodied Head!


  1. Anonymous2:53 PM

    Kudos to you. This is probably the most positive review for Zombi 3 I've ever read.

  2. Anonymous3:03 PM

    If you haven't seen Umberto Lenzi's Nightmare City, I highly recommend it. I suspect that you'd dig it.

  3. I'll have to check that out. I'm on something of a zombie kick now, and Fulci is one of those directors who I've been compelled to come to terms with (having initially hated "Zombi 2" but sensed that it was for reasons I wasn't sure of).

    This seems like the kind of movie that would be ripped on endlessly for its gaping logic holes and contrivances, but that really seems to me to be missing the point. Even though I think it's only okay, one doesn't have to lower their taste to enjoy "Zombi 3" - it just requires a different viewing lens.